Cross-validation techniques for risk estimation and model selection are widely used in statistics and machine learning. However, the understanding of the theoretical properties of learning via model selection with cross-validation risk estimation is quite low in face of its widespread use. In this context, this paper presents learning via model selection with cross-validation risk estimation as a general systematic learning framework within classical statistical learning theory and establishes distribution-free deviation bounds in terms of VC dimension, giving detailed proofs of the results and considering both bounded and unbounded loss functions. We also deduce conditions under which the deviation bounds of learning via model selection are tighter than that of learning via empirical risk minimization in the whole hypotheses space, supporting the better performance of model selection frameworks observed empirically in some instances.

We present a series of new and more favorable margin-based learning guarantees that depend on the empirical margin loss of a predictor. We give two types of learning bounds, both distribution-dependent and valid for general families, in terms of the Rademacher complexity or the empirical $\ell_\infty$ covering number of the hypothesis set used. Furthermore, using our relative deviation margin bounds, we derive distribution-dependent generalization bounds for unbounded loss functions under the assumption of a finite moment. We also briefly highlight several applications of these bounds and discuss their connection with existing results.

Statistical machine learning theory often tries to give generalization guarantees of machine learning models. Those models naturally underlie some fluctuation, as they are based on a data sample. If we were unlucky, and gathered a sample that is not representative of the underlying distribution, one cannot expect to construct a reliable machine learning model. Following that, statements made about the performance of machine learning models have to take the sampling process into account. The two common approaches for that are to generate statements that hold either in high-probability, or in-expectation, over the random sampling process. In this short note we show how one may transform one statement to another. As a technical novelty we address the case of unbounded loss function, where we use a fairly new assumption, called the witness condition.

Uniform deviation bounds limit the difference between a model's expected loss and its loss on an empirical sample uniformly for all models in a learning problem. As such, they are a critical component to empirical risk minimization. In this paper, we provide a novel framework to obtain uniform deviation bounds for loss functions which are *unbounded*. In our main application, this allows us to obtain bounds for $k$-Means clustering under weak assumptions on the underlying distribution. If the fourth moment is bounded, we prove a rate of $\mathcal{O}\left(m^{-\frac12}\right)$ compared to the previously known $\mathcal{O}\left(m^{-\frac14}\right)$ rate. Furthermore, we show that the rate also depends on the kurtosis - the normalized fourth moment which measures the "tailedness" of a distribution. We further provide improved rates under progressively stronger assumptions, namely, bounded higher moments, subgaussianity and bounded support.